PUBH 1000 Introduction To Public Health

Question You are required to draft reflections on a total of three debate topics. Your purpose is not to repeat information that was shared in the debate but rather to apply a critical lens to viewpoints raised. You may draw attention to evidence or perspectives not addressed in the debate. Answer The University Should Enact A Ban Against Sugar-Sweetened Beverages On Campus Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages has been on the rise in the university and as a result, debates whether they should be banned or not have intensified. Those who argue for the motion emphasize the negative health impact of sugar-sweetened drinks citing that these beverages lead to blood sugar extremes, poor dental health, obesity and so forth. Their primary aim is to guide students and other consumers in the university away from sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) such as juices, teas, and sodas to other risk-free drinks like water. Arguers who argue against ban of these substances point out that sugar-sweetened drink like soda help in keeping the consumer hydrated because they contain a lot of water content. In this particular essay, a continuation of this debate is provided in form of a reflection paper. Howse, Freeman, Wu, and Rooney (2018) in their study purpose to determine the viewpoints and attitudes of a given university population towards sugar-sweetened drinks in a university context. I agree with their views that there is a mounting interest in population-based, environment centered techniques meant to curtail the usability of sugar-sweetened substances owing to the health demerits associated with them. However, most of the marketers of SSBs are targeting young population in a university setting and thus it could be splendid if campaigns can be directed to this group to explain to them the drawbacks associated with SSBs. In so doing, the university would make a significant step towards lessening consumptions of these perilous beverages. When debating the issue of whether the university should ban sugar-sweetened beverages or not it is also important to consider other close substitutes which might remain unbanned. Taber and other researchers, (2015) in their article lay more emphasize on this particular point and to some degree I concur with their stand. According to them, policymakers in a university should not only focus on abolishing the common SSBs such as soda and juices but also other uncommon but sugar-sweetened drinks which might subject the consumers to more severe risks. It is through their argument that I learn that banning of Sugar-Sweetened beverages might come along with other adverse setbacks. Students might start consuming other harmful substances as substitutes to the banned ones. So, inasmuch as laws to ban SSBs are to be implemented, it is important to consider other possible consequences which might befall. Sundborn, (2014), says that prohibiting intake of sugary drinks in a school setting leads to both social and educational benefits. According to him, excessive sugar intake contributes to aggressive behaviors, suicidal thoughts, attention deficit, and dysphoria. I also believe that outlawing SSBs from the university will not only boost students’ health status but also their social performance. What is more, teaching and non-teaching staff who consume sugary drinks in the university will also be on the safe side. They will also be able to circumvent the negative results of drinking sugar-sweetened drinks and lead a healthier life both inside and outside the university premises. In conclusion, it is significant to emphasize that the importance of banning sugar-sweetened beverages in a university setting cannot be underestimated. As substantiated in this position paper, proper regulation of this group of drinks comes along with a number of advantages. Apart from enhancing the health status of consumers, it also enriches their social life. We have seen that excessive intake of sugar leads to issues such as suicidal feelings, impaired cognitive development, aggressive behaviors among others. This implies that banning SSBs in the university will help shape the life of learners in various dimensions. In order to achieve this with ease, a campaign program can be initiated to create awareness and educate people on the hazards concomitant to the consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks. References Howse, E., Freeman, B., Wu, J. H., & Rooney, K. (2018). ‘The university should promote health, but not enforce it’: opinions and attitudes about the regulation of sugar-sweetened beverages in a university setting. BMC public health, 18(1), 76. Taber, D. R., Chriqui, J. F., Vuillaume, R., Kelder, S. H., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2015). The association between state bans on soda only and adolescent substitution with other sugar-sweetened beverages: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), S7. Thornley, S., & Sundborn, G. (2014). The case to ban sugary food and drink from schools: these products are addictive, and kids will learn best without them. Pacific health dialog, 20(1), 17-21.

PUBH 1000 Introduction To Public Health

Calculate the price
of
your order:

Basic features

On-demand options

Paper format

Guaranteed originality

Affordable prices

Best experts

Calculate the price of your order

Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away

PUBH 1000 Introduction To Public Health

Calculate the price of your order:

Basic features

On-demand options

Paper format

Guaranteed originality

Affordable prices

Best experts

Calculate the price of your order

Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away

Calculate the price
of
your order: